When we lose someone close, we feel overwhelmed. Sadness and grief settle in our heart and the thought of never seeing that person again can be unbearable.
However, despite these feelings and the urge to kiss the person whom we lost, a doctor from Moldova, Dr. Viktor Ivanovik, shares the risks associated with kissing someone deceased. His video, in which he discusses this highly sensitive topic, has caused a widespread discussion and debate on social media.
According to him, around nine hours after someone dies, the body starts to decompose, a natural process during which bacteria from the decomposing tissues start to surface.
These bacteria can pose health risks to individuals who come into contact with the body, particularly through kissing.
He says he’s perfectly aware that this practice is seen as a final farewell and sort of respect towards the deceased person, but he believes people should be aware of the risk they put themselves into by unknowingly expose themselves to harmful pathogens.
As expected, people’s opinions were divided.
“I kissed my father and would do it again, no matter the risk! He is my father!” one person commented. Others, however, appreciated his advice and wrote they would reconsider their decision of kissing someone who has died as a final goodbye no matter the emotional connection they had with the deceased.
Dr. Ivanovik emphasized the issue of one’s sense of smell being affected if kissing someone who passed away.
The body’s decomposition can produce an unpleasant odor that might remain in one’s memory longer than expected. Some people report a significant change in their sense of smell and taste after such an act, adding another layer of complexity to the already emotional farewell experience.
“Honestly, I don’t think anyone can resist not kissing their parent on the hand or forehead one last time. I kissed my father’s hand for the last time,” a follower commented.
What are your thoughts on this?
Her Son Identifies As A Cat And Mom Is Upset The Vet Won’t Treat Him
Amidst the cacophony of the internet’s viral sensations, one peculiar video has captured the attention of global audiences. In this digital age where information spreads like wildfire, a seemingly ordinary American woman has become an unexpected protagonist in a narrative that challenges conventional notions of identity and societal norms.
The video, disseminated by a British commentator who ominously forewarned of societal collapse, features the American woman candidly sharing her perplexing ordeal. She reveals that her son, with an earnest conviction, identifies as a cat. What ensues is a discourse that traverses the boundaries of rationality, sparking debates on the fringes of acceptance and skepticism.
At the heart of the controversy lies the woman’s lamentation: despite her son’s steadfast identification as a feline, a veterinarian purportedly denied treatment, citing the undeniable reality of his human anatomy. It is this clash between subjective identity and objective reality that forms the crux of the woman’s grievance, casting a spotlight on the intricacies of discrimination and inclusion.
For the woman, her son’s assertion of being a cat transcends mere whimsy; it is a fundamental aspect of his being that warrants recognition and accommodation. In her impassioned plea for understanding, she asserts that her son’s self-professed identity should afford him the same rights and privileges as any other member of society. To her, the denial of veterinary care based on his human physiology is tantamount to discrimination—a stark reminder of the pervasive biases that persist in our ostensibly progressive world.
Leave a Reply