15 Pics That Prove Genes Can Be Very Powerful

We all have about 22,000 genes and sometimes we share enough genes with our family to be an almost identical copy of them. Although there may be 50 years between the 2 photos, their faces look the same thanks to the magic of these genes. There are some people who are carbon copies of their relatives, confirmed by their photos that simply blow us away.

Bright Side would like to share with you just how cool our genes can be with some exceptional photos we found.

1. “My mom and sister, both at age 6”

2. “My mom (left) age 4 in 1971. Me (right) age 4 in 2001. I see why people say we look alike.”

3. Grandmother 1941 and granddaughter 1999, same genes

4. “Me, 1992. Mom, 1954.”

5. “Here’s me and my fraternal twin.”

6. “Me on the left (circa ’90s, Canada) and my grand-dad (circa ’40s, Ireland).”

7. “My old man and me at the same age, 35 years apart.”

8. “Me in 1971 and my son in 1994”

9. “My mother at age 21 (L) and me at age 27.”

10. “My father, age 24 in 1951. And 24-year-old me.”

11. “I always knew that my mom and sister looked alike, but seeing them side by side is uncanny.”

12. “My brother (2016) and my grandfather (1948)”

13. “I’ve been told a lot that I look like my Finnish grandma.”

14. “My dad 1958… Me 1988.”

15. “Side-by-side comparison of my identical twin and me.”

Who do you look most like in your family? Share a photo of someone you look like so that we can compare!

Her Son Identifies As A Cat And Mom Is Upset The Vet Won’t Treat Him

Amidst the cacophony of the internet’s viral sensations, one peculiar video has captured the attention of global audiences. In this digital age where information spreads like wildfire, a seemingly ordinary American woman has become an unexpected protagonist in a narrative that challenges conventional notions of identity and societal norms.

The video, disseminated by a British commentator who ominously forewarned of societal collapse, features the American woman candidly sharing her perplexing ordeal. She reveals that her son, with an earnest conviction, identifies as a cat. What ensues is a discourse that traverses the boundaries of rationality, sparking debates on the fringes of acceptance and skepticism.

At the heart of the controversy lies the woman’s lamentation: despite her son’s steadfast identification as a feline, a veterinarian purportedly denied treatment, citing the undeniable reality of his human anatomy. It is this clash between subjective identity and objective reality that forms the crux of the woman’s grievance, casting a spotlight on the intricacies of discrimination and inclusion.

For the woman, her son’s assertion of being a cat transcends mere whimsy; it is a fundamental aspect of his being that warrants recognition and accommodation. In her impassioned plea for understanding, she asserts that her son’s self-professed identity should afford him the same rights and privileges as any other member of society. To her, the denial of veterinary care based on his human physiology is tantamount to discrimination—a stark reminder of the pervasive biases that persist in our ostensibly progressive world.

Related Posts

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*