The Republican candidate has won at least 277 Electoral College votes, per The Associated Press.
Donald Trump has been elected to return to the White House as the 47th United States president.
The vote was called for the Republican candidate by The Associated Press news agency early on Wednesday. His victory has been met by international congratulations but is likely to add further uncertainty to a turbulent geopolitical situation.
Results showed Trump beating Vice President Kamala Harris in a race far less tight than expected as he triumphed in key battleground states.
Victory in Wisconsin after earlier triumphs in Georgia, North Carolina and Pennsylvania saw the former president clear the threshold of the 270 Electoral College votes required to clinch the White House in Tuesday’s election.
Trump’s victory in those swing states currently sees him with 277 electoral votes against 224 for Harris. Polls had predicted a much tighter race, but it appears that anger fuelled the Republican’s remarkable comeback from defeat in 2020 and widespread condemnation of his refusal to accept the result.
That refusal sparked a violent insurrection at the US Capitol, and Trump was also convicted of felony charges and survived two assassination attempts.
However, his campaign, which has seen him demonise his political opponents, immigrants and many minorities, tapped into the frustrations of many voters in a bitterly polarised nation.
Speaking to his supporters as he declared victory, Trump claimed he had won “an unprecedented and powerful mandate”.
Anger and resentment
Scott Lucas, a professor of international politics at the University of Dublin, told Al Jazeera that Trump’s victory stemmed from frustrations that have been bubbling within the US public for years.
“There is anger and resentment in the US, which has been there for quite some time. It’s been a trauma since 9/11. It’s been there with the financial crash in 2008-2009. It was there in 2016 when Trump exploited it, and he exploited it again,” Lucas said, adding that Trump was able to do that because the “political system is damaged”.
Concern over the economy, and inflation in particular, under President Joe Biden was a major focus of the campaign.
That also encouraged opposition to the support Washington is giving to Ukraine in its war against Russia. Meanwhile, the failure to rein in Israel’s wars on Gaza and Lebanon has angered Muslim and liberal voters.
Those complex geopolitical issues will test Trump, who is known for his simplistic claims of being capable of quickly solving such issues.
He has promised to end the war in Ukraine in a day, an idea that has Kyiv wary that it could face pressure to strike a deal to hand over territory to Russia. NATO allies, meanwhile, fear Trump will weaken the alliance’s mutual defence guarantees.
Trump is also a strong supporter of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and has boasted he will end the war with Hamas in Gaza in hours.
“Your historic return to the White House offers a new beginning for America and a powerful recommitment to the great alliance between Israel and America. This is a huge victory!” Netanyahu said in a statement after Trump declared victory.
The enthusiasm in Israel also stems from the incoming president’s hawkish approach to Iran, which he is likely to reassert.
China is also braced for a more confrontational relationship with the US under Trump, who is expected to revive staunchly nationalistic trade policies, putting both allies and rivals on edge.
‘Much more dangerous era’
However, at home, supporters will look to Trump to put the focus on the welfare of US citizens while following through on promises to enact an agenda that would transform nearly every aspect of American government.
That will include plans to launch the largest deportation effort in the nation’s history and use the Department of Justice to punish his enemies.
The result is that “we are going into a much more dangerous era for Americans and for the world because this will not be a coherent US policy for America but one pursued for Trump,” Lucas said.
You Won’t Believe Kelly Clarkson’s Controversial Parenting Method!
In a straightforward radio interview, Kelly Clarkson, a proud mom to River Rose, 8, and Remy, 6, openly talked about her approach to disciplining her children, including spanking. This has sparked a lot of debate as parenting styles vary widely.
Clarkson, a famous figure in entertainment who recently received a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame, has been vocal about her choice to use spanking as a part of her parenting strategy. She explained that her upbringing and the cultural factors around her have shaped her perspective on this matter.
Kelly Clarkson’s recent statement that she’s “not above spanking” her children has sparked both approval and concern in a society where ideas about raising children vary widely and people feel strongly about their beliefs.
“I don’t mean hitting her,” she clarified, emphasizing that her goal isn’t to hurt her children but to use physical punishment in a controlled way. “I just mean a little spanking,” she further explained.
However, spanking has many critics. The American Academy of Pediatrics, a respected organization focused on children’s health, has clearly stated that spanking doesn’t work well and can harm a child’s well-being.
Even though experts advise against it, some parents still believe in using spanking as a form of discipline.
Kelly Clarkson’s support for spanking comes from her upbringing in Texas, a state with diverse cultural influences. “I’m from the South, y’all, so we get spankings,” she said, highlighting how regional and cultural backgrounds shape her views.
She openly talked about her own childhood experiences, saying, “My parents spanked me, and I turned out okay.” She believes spanking helped teach her important values and build her character, contributing to who she is today.
However, Kelly Clarkson faces challenges when she has to discipline her children in public because people might criticize her parenting style. “It’s tough to do in public because then people think it’s wrong,” she explained.
Despite potential criticism, she stands by her belief that spanking can be a valid way to discipline kids. “I believe in spanking,” she said, “so you might see me spanking my child at the zoo.”
Clarkson’s approach includes giving her children a warning, aiming to balance discipline with communication. “I’ll say, ‘Hi, I’m going to spank you on your bottom if you don’t stop right now. This is ridiculous,’” she explained, stressing the importance of talking openly during discipline.
She believes this method has helped reduce unwanted behavior.
The debate over Kelly Clarkson’s discipline method reflects larger discussions about different parenting styles and individual rights. While some support her approach, others advocate for non-physical methods.
In a community that values sharing experiences and open communication, it’s important to respect parents’ choices while also considering what’s best for their children’s well-being and growth.
In essence, Kelly Clarkson’s honesty about spanking has sparked a complex debate that shows the diverse ways parents approach raising their children.
As society changes, our ideas about good parenting evolve, and it’s important to have diverse perspectives that contribute to our collective understanding of parenting.
Leave a Reply