Roy Rogers, famously dubbed the “King of the Cowboys”, and his spouse Dale Evans, known as the “Queen of the West”, emerged as early luminaries in Hollywood’s nascent television era.
Rogers, celebrated for his role as the singing cowboy alongside his loyal palomino Trigger, ascended to become the preeminent star of Westerns during his time. He starred in more than a hundred films and headlined his own television series, The Roy Rogers Show.
Over the course of his life, Rogers fathered a total of nine children through his marriages with Grace Arline Wilkins and Dale Evans. While some of his offspring followed his footsteps into the entertainment industry, others pursued quieter lives away from public scrutiny. Here’s an individual glimpse into each of Roy Rogers’ children:
Cheryl Rogers: Adopted in 1941 with his second wife, Grace Arline Wilkins, from Hope Cottage in Texas. Cheryl grew up in the presence of her father’s beloved horse Trigger and appeared in several of his films during her childhood, including Meet Roy Rogers and Trail of Robin Hood.
Linda Lou Rogers: Born two years after Cheryl’s adoption to Grace. Linda married Gary Johnson, a minister, and the couple shared over four decades together until his passing in 2008. Linda now resides in California, surrounded by their children and grandchildren.
Roy Rogers Jr. (Dusty): The only biological son of Roy Rogers, born shortly before Grace’s untimely death due to childbirth complications. Dusty made childhood appearances on The Roy Rogers Show and later managed his father’s career. He also performed with the Sons of the Pioneers and formed his band, Roy Rogers Jr. and the High Riders.
Robin Elizabeth Rogers: The only child born to Dale Evans and Roy Rogers, Robin tragically passed away before her second birthday due to complications from the mumps. In her memory, Dale authored the book Angel Unaware.
Dodie Rogers: Adopted at seven months old, Dodie, of Native American heritage, married Jon Patterson, a NASA employee, and they welcomed a daughter named Kristin. Dodie now enjoys her role as a grandmother.
Mimi Rogers: Born Marion Fleming in Edinburgh, Scotland, Mimi was discovered by Roy and Dale in a children’s home due to her exceptional singing talents. She became a cherished member of their family, marrying Dan, a Marine Corps member, with whom she had three children before his passing. Mimi is now a grandmother herself.
Debbie Rogers: Adopted during the Korean War after becoming orphaned, Debbie tragically died at the age of 12 in a bus accident in Los Angeles while traveling with other children from her church.
Sandy Rogers: Adopted following Robin’s passing, John David “Sandy” Rogers later joined the U.S. Army but sadly passed away at age 18 in a choking incident at a military hospital in Germany.
Tom Fox: Dale’s biological son from her previous marriage, Tom was raised by Roy and Dale. He pursued a career as a school teacher and music minister before his passing in 2012.
The saga of Roy Rogers and Dale Evans’ family is marked by a tapestry of happiness, sorrow, and love, emblematic of their enduring family values and profound legacy.
Kevin Costner, the famous Hollywood actor and director, is currently facing a Iawsuit
Kevin Costner, the famous Hollywood actor and director, is currently facing a Iawsuit from his neighbor over a view.
The lawsuit alleges that Costner’s property obstructs the neighbor’s scenic view of the Pacific Ocean. The dispute has drawn attention due to the high-profile nature of the parties invoIved, as well as the potential implications for property rights and zoning laws.
Costner is no stranger to lawsuits as reported by The Hollywood Reporter:
The lawsuit was filed by Rick Grimm, a retired professor, who owns a property adjacent to Costner’s estate in Carpinteria, California. Grimm claims that Costner’s constru ction of a berm and the planting of trees have obstructed his view of the ocean.
Grimm alleges that the berm and trees were intentionally placed by Costner to block his view, and that the construction vioIates local zoning laws. Kevin Costner’s representatives have denied the allegations, stating that the berm and trees were installed for erosion controI and that they do not significantly impact Grimm’s view. They also argue that Grimm’s claim is baseless, as he does not own the right to an unobstructed view. The dispute has yet to be resolved, and both parties are expected to present their arguments in court.
The lawsuit raises severaI questions about property rights and zoning laws. While homeowners generally have the right to enjoy their property as they see fit, there are limits to what they can do with their land. Zoning laws, which vary by location, regulate the use and development of land in a given area. These laws are designed to promote public safety, preserve natural resources, and maintain the character of a neighborhood.
In this case, Grimm argues that Costner’s construction vioIates zoning laws, as it obstructs his view and alters the character of the neighborhood. Costner’s representatives counter that the construction is within the bounds of the law and does not significantly impact Grimm’s view.
The outcome of the lawsuit could have significant implications for property owners and zoning laws. If Grimm prevails, it could establish a precedent that home owners must consider their neighbors’ views when making aIterations to their property.
This could make it more difficult for home owners to make changes to their homes or land, particularly in areas with strict zoning laws.
On the other hand, if Costner prevaiIs, it could reinforce the principle that property owners have the right to enjoy their land as they see fit, within the bounds of the law. This could make it easier for homeowners to make changes to their property without fear of legal repercussions, although they may still need to comply with zoning regulations.
The Iawsuit between Kevin Costner and his neighbor over a view raises important questions about property rights and zoning laws. While the outcome is uncertain, the case highlights the importance of considering the impact of property alterations on neighbors and the surrounding community.
Leave a Reply