Vanna White, the beloved game show icon, has recentIy negotiated a pay raise for her role on Celebrity Wheel of Fortune, according to a new report. While she remains in talks to continue on the show after Pat Sajak’s departure, her pay for the regular Wheel of Fortune show is still undetermined. The negotiated deal pertains specifically to her invoIvement in Celebrity Wheel of Fortune, a 13-episode spinoff featuring 27 celebrities.
The agreement, reportedly reached through her attorney Bryan Freedman, known for representing high-profiIe figures such as Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly, is said to be worth $100,000 per episode.
This amount is considerably lower than the reported $400,000 salary Sajak, aged 76, earned during the show’s first season.
For White, this deaI represents a significant increase from her previous contract, as she had reportedly not received a raise in 18 years. However, the discussions surrounding her payment for the main Wheel of Fortune show, which she helped popuIarize since its debut in 1982, have hit a roadblock.
Currently earning $3 million, just a fifth of Sajak’s salary, White has requested 50 percent of Sajak’s $15 million annual earnings. Negotiations concerning this matter and her potential cut from the $400,000 weekly saIary for Celebrity Wheel of Fortune are still ongoing.
Despite settling on the $100,000 per episode deal for the spinoff, discussions about White’s continued role on the original game show remain unresolved. Sajak is set to retire at the end of the upcoming season, with Ryan Seacrest slated to take over the hosting duties, earning a staggering $28 million per year.
When this Teen Daughter Leaves Mother in Favor of Cheating Father
The course of one woman’s life took a sharp turn when she entered into marriage with a wealthy man, believing he would be a blessing to her family. Sharing her story on Reddit, she recounted his acts of generosity, from lavishing expensive gifts upon her parents to settling her sister’s credit card debts and securing a lucrative job for her brother at a prestigious firm. Despite his infidelity, her husband remained faithful to her, garnering admiration from her in-laws for his unwavering support during tough times.
The first crack in their marriage surfaced soon after the birth of their daughter, Kelly. Faced with the dilemma of leaving her husband, she sought counsel from loved ones, yet found herself unable to take decisive action, convincing herself that his infidelity stemmed from her perceived inadequacies as a wife during pregnancy. The second instance of betrayal occurred when Kelly was around 12 years old, prompting her mother to seriously consider divorce.
Despite her resolve to end the marriage, familial pressures, fueled by a desire to avoid scandal, weighed heavily against her. Reluctantly, she proceeded with the divorce, though custody battles left her without Kelly by her side, despite receiving alimony and a fair settlement.
Painted as the antagonist by her in-laws and parents, she faced an uphill battle to maintain a connection with her daughter. Only her steadfast friend Tina provided solace and support through the ordeal, serving as both confidante and anchor during tumultuous times.
Though she extended financial support for Kelly’s education, the rift between mother and daughter persisted, exacerbated by stringent conditions outlined in her will. Kelly, however, forged her own path, pursuing an accounting degree and a successful career, distancing herself from her mother’s inheritance to assert her independence.
Life, however, has a way of reshuffling the deck. Kelly, now financially self-reliant, sought to mend bridges with her mother, especially as her father’s fortunes dwindled, leaving her college fund depleted. This unexpected turn of events led to a tentative reconciliation, with Kelly relinquishing her claim to her mother’s estate in exchange for support for her graduate studies.
In a twist of fate, Laura, the woman’s goddaughter, emerged as the primary beneficiary in her will, sparking familial discord and bitterness over the perceived injustice.
Leave a Reply