Imagine a job where you get paid a whopping $130,000 just to change a single lightbulb. It sounds unbelievable, right? Well, it’s true, but there’s more to it. This unique job, known as a Tower Climber, has been making waves on social media because of its high pay and daring nature.
Tower Climbers are tasked with replacing lightbulbs on signal towers that can be over 600 meters tall. These towers are not like regular buildings—they are designed with thin metal brackets that go higher up. What’s astonishing is that climbers rely only on a safety rope as they scale these immense heights. A viral TikTok video by Science8888 shows just how thrilling and risky this job can be.
To become a Tower Climber, you need nerves of steel and no fear of heights. It takes about three hours to climb up and down these towers, and they endure winds of nearly 100 kilometers per hour at the top. Climbers must be physically fit and have a strong grip to handle the job safely.
While the TikTok video claims Tower Climbers can earn around $130,000 a year, actual salaries vary based on experience and location. Entry-level climbers might start around $17 per hour, but with more experience, they can earn up to $40 per hour or more, depending on the job market.
Despite the skepticism sparked by the high salary, reputable sources like Field Engineer and Jooble confirm the reality of this job. It’s not just about the money—it’s also about the adventure and the chance to work in breathtaking locations.
In conclusion, the Tower Climber job proves that unconventional careers can offer big rewards for those willing to take on the challenge. If you’re brave enough and love heights, this job could be your ticket to a thrilling career with a handsome paycheck. Would you dare to climb to great heights for a bright future? The choice is yours.
Fani Willis Takes a Stand Against Nathan Wade – “The Only Thing A Woman Can Do For Him Is Make A Sandwich”
Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis recently took to the stand where she spoke to the character of special prosecutor Nathan Wade. Willis’ relationship with Wade has come under increased scrutiny amid allegations of financiaI misconduct. Many have alleged the controversial relationship between Willis and Wade poses a massive conflict of interest.
According to Willis, her conversations with Wade were argumentative by nature, pertaining to the special prosecutor’s view of women. This district attorney claimed that Wade only sees value in women insofar as they will “make him a sandwich.” Willis explained how this dynamic was a source of tension in her relationship with Wade, noting how she gave “him his money back.”
“Mister, let’s go on and have the conversation,” Willis said. “Had absolutely nothing to do with this. It’s interesting that we’re here about this money. Mr. Wade is used to women that, as he told me one time, only thing a woman can do for him is make him a sandwich. We would have brutaI arguments about the fact that I am your equal. I don’t need anything from a man a man is not a plan. A man is a companion. And so there was tension always in our relationship, which is why I was give him his money back. I don’t need anybody to foot my bills, the only man who’s ever put my bills completely is my daddy.”
Following her monologue, Willis was asked, “Is there anything else you’d like to add to that?” She responded, “No. I’m sure we’ll talk about it further.” Willis’ comments about Wade have quickly made the rounds on social media.
Conservative Brief shared footage of Willis’ testimony on X, with the caption, “The Character Assassination Continues! On the stand, Fulton County DA Fani Willis continues to paint her lover Nathan Wade in a terrible light: “Mr. Wade is used to women that— as he told me one time— the only thing a woman can do for him is make a sandwich.””
The American Tribune recently reported on comments from Nathan Wade’s testimony about his extravagant trips with Fani Willi. Many have alleged the trips have been prime exampIes of Willis abusing her position of power to misuse government funds.
A Fulton County Judge recently ruled that Willis and Wade would be forced to testify on these allegations of financial misconduct. Judge McAfee ruled, “I think the issues at point here are whether a relationship existed, whether that relationship was romantic or non-romantic in nature, when it formed, and whether it continues. And that’s only relevant because it’s in combination with the question of the existence and extent of any personal benefit conveyed as a result of their relationship.”
Judge McAfee continued in his ruling, “And so because I think its possibIe that the facts alleged by the defendant could result in disqualification, I think an evidentiary hearing must occur to establish the record on those core allegations.”
See footage of Fani Willis’ testimony below:
A Fulton County Judge recently ruled that Willis and Wade would be forced to testify on these allegations of financial misconduct. Judge McAfee ruled, “I think the issues at point here are whether a relationship existed, whether that relationship was romantic or non-romantic in nature, when it formed, and whether it continues. And that’s only relevant because it’s in combination with the question of the existence and extent of any personal benefit conveyed as a result of their relationship.”
Leave a Reply